QIWSign in
Back to judgement

DossierALK

Content in the run’s language (EN)

SectionClaimSourceStatusAs of
biomarker
ALK rearrangement is a validated predictive biomarker for ALK-targeted therapy in metastatic NSCLC.
The FDA prescribing information directs selection of metastatic NSCLC patients for crizotinib based on ALK positivity in tumor specimens detected by an FDA-approved test. This establishes ALK rearrangement/positivity as the clinically actionable biomarker for ALK inhibition.
www.accessdata.fda.govverifiedSep 1, 2023
biomarker
In untreated advanced ALK-positive NSCLC, biomarker-selected patients derived substantially greater benefit from ALK inhibition with crizotinib than from platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy.
In the randomized phase 3 PROFILE 1014 trial, patients were centrally confirmed to have an ALK rearrangement using the Vysis ALK Break-Apart FISH assay. Crizotinib improved median progression-free survival to 10.9 versus 7.0 months (HR 0.45) and objective response rate was 74% versus 45% with chemotherapy.
www.nejm.orgverifiedDec 4, 2014
biomarker
Baseline ALK resistance mutations are a response-enriching biomarker for lorlatinib after failure of second-generation ALK inhibitors.
In the phase 2 lorlatinib biomarker analysis of 198 previously treated ALK-positive NSCLC patients, those who had failed at least one second-generation ALK TKI had higher objective response rates when an ALK mutation was detected: 62% versus 32% by plasma genotyping and 69% versus 27% by tissue genotyping.…
ascopubs.orgverifiedMay 20, 2019
biomarker
ALK positivity does not ensure durable dependence on ALK signaling because resistance can arise through both on-target and off-target mechanisms.
Analysis of 103 repeat biopsies from ALK-positive patients progressing on ALK inhibitors identified distinct secondary ALK resistance mutations, including enrichment of G1202R after second-generation therapy; resistant models without ALK mutations were also resistant to lorlatinib, consistent with non-ALK-dependent…
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govverifiedJul 18, 2016
biomarker
Longitudinal plasma ALK mutation kinetics provide pharmacodynamic evidence consistent with on-target ALK inhibition by lorlatinib.
In 22 ALK-positive NSCLC patients with acquired resistance to ALK TKIs, plasma and tissue ALK mutation calls were 100% concordant in contemporaneous paired samples. ALK mutations emerged and disappeared according to the administered TKI, and the common second-generation-TKI resistance mutation ALK G1202R was…
ascopubs.orgverifiedJan 23, 2018
biomarker
ALK FISH positivity can represent a nonproductive rearrangement rather than an expressed, targetable ALK fusion.
In a discordant NSCLC series, three clearly ALK-IHC-negative/FISH-positive samples were negative for ALK fusion transcripts by two RNA-based assays; four patients with borderline FISH results received ALK TKIs without benefit. This weakens the assumption that genomic break-apart signals alone demonstrate target…
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govverifiedNov 22, 2018
clinical
ALK is clinically validated as a predictive therapeutic biomarker in advanced NSCLC by randomized phase 3 evidence showing superior efficacy of ALK inhibition over platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy.
In PROFILE 1014, 343 previously untreated patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC were randomized to crizotinib or platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy. Crizotinib significantly improved progression-free survival, objective response rate, lung-cancer symptoms, and quality of life, establishing ALK-directed therapy as a…
doi.orgverifiedDec 4, 2014
clinical
Second-generation ALK inhibition provides superior systemic and intracranial disease control compared with first-generation therapy in untreated advanced ALK-positive NSCLC.
In the randomized phase 3 ALEX trial, alectinib reduced the risk of progression or death versus crizotinib (HR 0.47; 95% CI 0.34–0.65) and reduced CNS progression (cause-specific HR 0.16). Twelve-month progression-free survival was 68.4% with alectinib versus 48.7% with crizotinib.
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govverifiedAug 31, 2017
clinical
Brigatinib demonstrated superior first-line efficacy, including intracranial activity, versus crizotinib in ALK-positive advanced NSCLC.
In ALTA-1L, brigatinib reduced the risk of disease progression or death versus crizotinib (HR 0.49; P<0.001); 12-month progression-free survival was 67% with brigatinib versus 43% with crizotinib. The treatment effect was particularly pronounced in patients with baseline brain metastases (HR 0.20).
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govverifiedNov 22, 2018
clinical
Lorlatinib provides durable long-term clinical benefit in treatment-naive advanced ALK-positive NSCLC, with sustained systemic and intracranial disease control.
The 7-year CROWN update reported a progression-free survival hazard ratio of 0.19 for lorlatinib versus crizotinib; median progression-free survival remained unreached with lorlatinib, and the study demonstrated durable benefit through extended follow-up, including in patients with baseline brain metastases.
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govverifiedMay 29, 2026
clinical
Ensartinib provides regulatory-confirmed clinical validation of ALK as a treatment target in previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC.
The FDA approved ensartinib on December 18, 2024, based on the randomized phase 3 eXALT3 trial. Among 290 patients, ensartinib significantly improved independently reviewed progression-free survival versus crizotinib (HR 0.56; 95% CI 0.40–0.79; P=0.0007), with median progression-free survival of 25.8 versus 12.7…
www.fda.govverifiedDec 18, 2024
clinical
The pivotal PROFILE 1014 trial did not demonstrate a statistically significant overall-survival benefit for first-line crizotinib in the unadjusted analysis.
With 84.2% of chemotherapy-arm patients crossing over to crizotinib, the unadjusted overall-survival hazard ratio was 0.760 (95% CI 0.548–1.053; P=0.0978); median OS was not reached with crizotinib versus 47.5 months with chemotherapy. The OS advantage appeared only after a crossover-adjusted analysis.
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govverifiedMay 16, 2018
competitive
ALK-positive NSCLC is a highly competitive targeted-therapy segment with three preferred first-line ALK TKIs—alectinib, brigatinib, and lorlatinib—and no direct randomized head-to-head trials establishing superiority among them.
The ASCO living guideline recommends alectinib, brigatinib, or lorlatinib as first-line therapy and notes that pivotal trials used crizotinib as the comparator; it explicitly acknowledges the absence of head-to-head trials between second-generation ALK TKIs and lorlatinib. This makes differentiation primarily…
ascopubs.orgverified
competitive
Lorlatinib differentiates through exceptional long-term systemic and intracranial disease control in treatment-naive ALK-positive NSCLC.
In the phase III CROWN trial, five-year PFS was 60% with lorlatinib versus 8% with crizotinib, with a PFS hazard ratio of 0.19. Median time to intracranial progression was not reached with lorlatinib versus 16.4 months with crizotinib, with an intracranial-progression hazard ratio of 0.06. The publication describes…
ascopubs.orgverifiedMay 31, 2024
competitive
Ensartinib adds a newly approved first-line competitor with clinically meaningful PFS improvement over crizotinib, but its differentiation is not yet established against preferred next-generation ALK TKIs.
The FDA approved ensartinib on December 18, 2024, for previously untreated ALK-positive locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC. In the randomized eXALT3 trial, ensartinib improved PFS versus crizotinib with HR 0.56; median PFS was 25.8 versus 12.7 months. Overall survival was not statistically different, and the FDA…
www.fda.govfailedDec 18, 2024
competitive
Lorlatinib has mechanistic differentiation through broad activity against single ALK kinase-domain resistance mutations, including G1202R, a major resistance mutation after earlier-generation ALK TKIs.
A systematic molecular study of post-treatment samples and engineered models found that lorlatinib was the only tested ALK inhibitor to potently inhibit ALK phosphorylation across all evaluated single secondary ALK mutations, including G1202R. This supports a differentiated role for lorlatinib after progression on…
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.govverifiedJul 18, 2016
competitive
Competition is extending toward fourth-generation ALK inhibitors designed to address compound resistance mutations that can emerge after lorlatinib.
The ASCO 2026.3.0 living guideline identifies ongoing development of next-generation or fourth-generation ALK inhibitors, including NVL-655 and TPX-0131, with activity against compound ALK mutations that commonly emerge after lorlatinib. This indicates that current differentiation is dynamic and that lorlatinib’s…
ascopubs.orgfailed
competitive
Direct head-to-head evidence did not show brigatinib was superior to alectinib after crizotinib failure, indicating limited differentiation among ALK inhibitors.
In the phase 3 ALTA-3 trial, median blinded independent review committee-assessed PFS was 19.3 months with brigatinib versus 19.2 months with alectinib (HR 0.97; p=0.8672), and the study met its futility criterion. Treatment-related laboratory abnormalities were common with both drugs, although their safety profiles…
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govunverifiedAug 12, 2023
genetics
Causal oncogenic fusions
EML4-ALK fusions are causal drivers with unambiguous direction of effect in fusion-positive NSCLC.
verifiedJan 1, 2018
genetics
A recurrent EML4–ALK fusion is a transforming somatic genetic alteration in human NSCLC.
The original study identified a small chromosome 2p inversion producing EML4–ALK in NSCLC cells; the fusion transcript was detected in 5 of 75 patients (6.7%), was distinct from EGFR-mutant tumors, and transformed fibroblasts in culture and nude mice.
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govverifiedAug 2, 2007
genetics
Independent comprehensive tumor-genome profiling confirms ALK rearrangements as recurrent somatic driver events in lung adenocarcinoma.
The TCGA study profiled 230 untreated lung adenocarcinomas using matched tumor/normal DNA, RNA, copy-number, methylation and proteomic data; ALK fusions were identified among the recurrent kinase rearrangements, with 3 of 230 tumors reported as ALK-fusion positive in the genomic analysis.
www.nature.comverifiedJul 9, 2014
genetics
Authoritative germline ALK susceptibility is established for neuroblastic tumors, not NSCLC.
GeneReviews defines ALK-related inherited susceptibility as risk for neuroblastoma, ganglioneuroblastoma, and ganglioneuroma. It describes somatic ALK translocations in NSCLC separately and does not identify NSCLC as a phenotype of germline ALK susceptibility.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.govverifiedMay 23, 2024
genetics
ALK rearrangements occur in a reproducible molecular subset of advanced NSCLC, enriched in younger and never-smoking patients.
In a US real-world cohort of 19,895 advanced NSCLC patients with documented ALK testing, 519 (2.6%) had an ALK rearrangement; prevalence was 8.9% in never-smokers, 21.6% in patients aged 18–39 years, and 6.3% among Asian patients.
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govverifiedJan 1, 2021
genetics
Rare intragenic ALK inversions and deletions are recurrent tumor-genome alterations that can encode clinically actionable ALK activation.
Comprehensive genomic profiling of 39,159 NSCLC cases identified ALK internal inversions as the sole ALK rearrangement in 6 cases (0.02%) and internal deletions in 3 cases (0.01%). RNA testing confirmed EML4–ALK in 2 of 2 evaluated inversion cases, and all 3 treated inversion cases had durable responses to ALK…
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govverifiedApr 17, 2020
genetics
A large NSCLC germline sequencing study found that inherited susceptibility explains only a minority of cases and did not establish ALK as an NSCLC predisposition gene.
In 1,026 NSCLC patients tested with a 58-gene hereditary-cancer panel, plausible genetic susceptibility was identified in 4.7% (14 pathogenic and 34 likely pathogenic cases). The study emphasized that the genetic predisposition of lung cancer remains incompletely elucidated; the reported susceptibility findings…
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.govverified
mechanism
Constitutive fusion kinase activity
The fusion drives constitutive kinase activity; the mechanism is precisely defined.
verifiedJan 1, 2018
mechanism
ALK rearrangements in NSCLC create oncogenic ALK fusion proteins whose constitutive signaling promotes tumor-cell proliferation and survival.
The FDA-approved XALKORI prescribing information states that ALK translocations produce oncogenic fusion proteins, and that these fusions activate and dysregulate ALK expression and signaling, contributing to increased proliferation and survival. It also reports concentration-dependent inhibition of ALK…
dailymed.nlm.nih.govverified
mechanism
The recurrent EML4-ALK fusion is a transforming oncogenic driver in NSCLC.
The original Nature study identified EML4-ALK in human NSCLC and demonstrated that the fusion gene transforms cells, establishing a direct mechanistic link between ALK rearrangement and lung-cancer pathogenesis.
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govverifiedAug 2, 2007
mechanism
RAS–RAF–MEK–ERK/MAPK is the primary downstream survival pathway in EML4-ALK-positive lung adenocarcinoma models.
In EML4-ALK lung-cancer models, inhibition of MAPK signaling suppressed growth comparably to ALK inhibition, whereas PI3K-AKT or JAK-STAT inhibition had less effect. EML4-ALK activated all three major RAS isoforms through the EML4 HELP domain, and genetic activation of RAS, RAF, or MEK rescued cells from ALK…
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govverifiedAug 24, 2015
mechanism
The EML4 portion of EML4-ALK promotes cytoplasmic phase-separated condensates that organize downstream signaling, including STAT3 activation, and support lung tumorigenesis.
The study found that EML4-ALK variant 1 forms cytoplasmic condensates through phase separation in human cancer cells and in genetically engineered mouse-model tumors. Mutating aromatic residues in EML4 impaired condensate formation, reduced downstream signaling—especially STAT3 phosphorylation—and decreased malignant…
www.nature.comverifiedMay 11, 2021
mechanism
ALK rearrangement does not uniformly establish ALK pathway dependence across NSCLC models.
In the original EML4-ALK study, a selective ALK inhibitor strongly inhibited only 1 of 3 EML4-ALK-positive NSCLC cell lines; the other two were resistant and showed no growth arrest or apoptosis. The authors noted that ALK inhibition alone might not be sufficient for some EML4-ALK tumors.
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.govverifiedJul 1, 2008
mechanism
ALK fusion variants produce materially different pathway dependency and inhibitor sensitivity.
Different EML4-ALK variants and fusion partners showed differential sensitivity to structurally distinct ALK inhibitors, correlated with differences in fusion-protein stability. This complicates treating “ALK” as a uniform mechanistic biomarker.
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govunverified
perturbation
Direct ALK knockdown selectively impairs viability and clonogenic growth of EML4-ALK-positive NSCLC cells.
In H3122 and H2228 EML4-ALK-positive lung adenocarcinoma cells, siRNA knockdown of ALK reduced cell viability by at least 60% and significantly reduced colony formation; these effects were not observed in ALK-rearrangement-negative HCC827 and H157 cells. ALK knockdown also reduced viability in the patient-derived…
www.oncotarget.comverifiedApr 7, 2016
perturbation
Genome-wide CRISPR knockout screens identify bypass alterations that permit survival under ALK inhibition, demonstrating context-dependent ALK-TKI dependence.
In an ALK-positive patient-derived NSCLC cell line, genome-wide CRISPR/Cas9 knockout screening under alectinib or lorlatinib identified MIG6/ERRFI1 loss as a resistance mechanism. MIG6 knockout was validated in vitro and in vivo and restored survival under ALK-TKI treatment through EGFR–MAPK and PI3K/AKT/mTOR…
insight.jci.orgverifiedNov 2, 2023
perturbation
CRISPR-Cas9 resistance screens show that KEAP1 loss modulates response to ALK inhibition in ALK-mutant lung cancer cells.
A CRISPR-Cas9 gene-deletion screen performed under ALK inhibition identified KEAP1 loss as a modifier of response. KEAP1 loss reduced treatment-associated oxidative stress and enabled proliferation despite MAPK-pathway inhibition, providing perturbational evidence for a genetically defined resistance route to…
elifesciences.orgverifiedFeb 1, 2017
perturbation
CRISPR loss of KEAP1 can produce resistance to ALK inhibition in ALK-mutant lung cancer models.
Genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 drug-resistance screens found that KEAP1 loss modulated response to ALK inhibitors; validation included KEAP1 knockout in MGH-065 ALK-mutant cells treated with LDK378 or crizotinib, and H3122 cells treated with crizotinib. This indicates that ALK inhibition can be bypassed by a redox/metabolic…
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govverifiedFeb 1, 2017
perturbation
Genome-wide CRISPR knockout identified MIG6/ERRFI1 loss as a mechanism of resistance to ALK TKIs through EGFR bypass signaling.
In a patient-derived ALK-rearranged NSCLC line, loss of MIG6/ERRFI1 conferred tolerance or resistance to ALK inhibitors; low-dose EGF further enhanced survival and proliferation, while EGFR blockade resensitized MIG6-deficient cells. This weakens the premise that perturbing ALK alone is sufficient across relevant…
insight.jci.orgverifiedDec 22, 2023
perturbation
CRISPR-based in vivo perturbation shows that EML4-ALK variants are functionally heterogeneous rather than a uniform dependency context.
Somatic genome editing generated EML4-ALK V1- and V3-driven lung tumors, and multiplexed CRISPR inactivation of 29 tumor-suppressor genes produced variant-specific effects on tumorigenesis. V3 was more oncogenic than V1, and pharmacogenomic analyses indicated that tumor genotype can alter response to ALK inhibition,…
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govverifiedJan 12, 2026
safety
Favourable on-target safety
Narrow adult expression predicts a favourable on-target safety profile.
verifiedJan 1, 2018
safety
ALK signaling is essential for proliferation and survival in at least a subset of EML4-ALK-positive NSCLC models.
In a primary NSCLC study, the selective ALK inhibitor TAE684 inhibited growth of EML4-ALK-positive H3122 cells in vitro and in vivo, inhibited AKT phosphorylation, and induced apoptosis; activity was not uniform across all EML4-ALK-positive lines, indicating context-dependent but strong ALK dependency.
aacrjournals.orgverifiedJul 1, 2008
safety
Clinical responses to ALK inhibition provide strong evidence that ALK rearrangements are tumor-essential drivers in ALK-positive NSCLC.
In the first expanded clinical study of crizotinib, 82 patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC were treated; the reported objective response rate was approximately 57%, demonstrating substantial antitumor dependence on ALK kinase activity in molecularly selected tumors.
www.nejm.orgverifiedOct 28, 2010
safety
Wild-type ALK appears to have limited essentiality for survival of adult normal tissues, although loss of ALK produces specific reproductive and neuroendocrine phenotypes in mice.
A targeted kinase-domain ALK knockout mouse model produced viable and fertile homozygous animals without gross embryonic or adult morphological abnormalities, but with reduced testosterone, delayed pubertal onset, and altered gonadotropin-releasing-hormone neuron numbers. This supports a therapeutic window while…
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govverifiedJan 1, 2015
safety
ALK inhibition has a generally manageable clinical safety profile but carries clinically important risks, including hepatotoxicity, interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis, QT prolongation, bradycardia, severe visual loss, and embryo-fetal toxicity.
The FDA-aligned XALKORI prescribing information reports common adult NSCLC adverse reactions including visual disorders, gastrointestinal toxicity, edema, elevated transaminases, fatigue, dizziness, and neuropathy, and identifies serious organ-specific warnings requiring monitoring or treatment interruption.
dailymed.nlm.nih.govunverifiedSep 1, 2023
safety
Alectinib has clinically important hepatotoxicity and other organ toxicities that complicate the safety case for ALK inhibition.
The June 2026 FDA label reports hepatotoxicity in 41% of the pooled 533-patient safety population, grade ≥3 hepatotoxicity in 8%, ILD/pneumonitis in 1.3%, renal impairment in 12% including fatal cases, bradycardia in 11%, elevated CPK in 56%, and hemolytic anemia in 3.1% of ALINA patients. The label also warns of…
www.accessdata.fda.govverifiedJun 11, 2026
safety
First-line lorlatinib produces a high burden of metabolic, neurologic and other adverse events, with more grade 3–4 toxicity than crizotinib.
In the phase 3 CROWN trial, grade 3–4 adverse events occurred in 72% of lorlatinib-treated patients versus 56% with crizotinib, driven mainly by altered lipid levels. Lorlatinib-specific frequent events included hypercholesterolemia in 70%, hypertriglyceridemia in 64%, cognitive effects in 21%, mood effects in 16%,…
www.nejm.orgverifiedNov 19, 2020
tissue
In NSCLC, oncogenic ALK is found in malignant lung epithelial tumor cells, predominantly as an EML4–ALK fusion in a molecular subset of tumors.
The original discovery study identified the EML4–ALK fusion in NSCLC cells and detected the fusion transcript in 5 of 75 NSCLC patients (6.7%); forced expression transformed cells, supporting a tumor-cell-intrinsic role.
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govunverifiedAug 2, 2007
tissue
ALK rearrangements are directly detectable in lung adenocarcinoma tumor tissue and are associated with ALK protein expression in the tumor cells.
In a multicenter tissue-microarray study of 594 resected NSCLCs, ALK rearrangement was identified in 7 cases by FISH, and all seven ALK-positive cases were identified by ALK immunohistochemistry. The ALK-positive tumors included acinar, papillary, minimally invasive and pleomorphic lung carcinomas.
www.nature.comverifiedJun 7, 2013
tissue
Alveolar epithelial cells can serve as a relevant lung cellular context for EML4–ALK-driven tumorigenesis in vivo.
A conditional transgenic mouse model expressed EML4–ALK under the surfactant protein C promoter, targeting lung alveolar epithelial cells, and developed EML4–ALK-positive lung tumors. This is mechanistic preclinical evidence and does not by itself establish the exact human cell of origin.
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.govverifiedDec 8, 2008
tissue
ALK rearrangement is frequently subclonal or unevenly distributed across NSCLC tumor cells rather than present uniformly throughout the tumor.
In a 1,426-specimen FISH study, the proportion of rearranged cells varied substantially; only 8.1% of specimens had more than 50% ALK-positive cells, while 8.5% had 10–15% positive cells. The authors also observed atypical patterns and noted that not every cell in an ALK-positive tumor necessarily showed a detectable…
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govverifiedSep 10, 2013
tissue
ALK-rearranged lung carcinomas can contain mixed histologic and cellular differentiation, so morphology alone does not define a single ALK-associated tissue or cell type.
In 54 extensively sampled ALK-rearranged lung carcinomas, all tumors had at least a focal adenocarcinoma component, but 3 also showed squamous differentiation and 2 showed sarcomatoid differentiation. Although characteristic patterns were enriched, no histologic parameter was completely sensitive or specific for ALK…
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govverified
tissue
ALK-positive NSCLC is most strongly represented in the lung adenocarcinoma epithelial compartment, with frequent pulmonary adenocarcinoma markers and characteristic tumor-cell morphology.
Studies of ALK-rearranged lung adenocarcinoma report association with solid, micropapillary and papillary-predominant patterns and signet-ring tumor cells; ALK-positive tumors commonly show TTF-1 expression, supporting localization to pulmonary adenocarcinoma cells rather than a nonspecific stromal compartment.
www.sciencedirect.comfailed
tractability
Several approved ALK TKIs
Several approved ALK TKIs demonstrate strong small-molecule tractability.
verifiedJan 1, 2018
tractability
ALK is clinically tractable with an established oral small-molecule kinase-inhibitor modality in metastatic NSCLC.
The FDA label identifies lorlatinib as a kinase inhibitor for metastatic ALK-positive NSCLC, selected by an FDA-approved test, with oral tablet dosing at 100 mg once daily. This provides direct regulatory evidence for both target tractability and a validated modality.
www.accessdata.fda.govverified
tractability
First-line ALK inhibition produces strong systemic and intracranial clinical efficacy, supporting high tractability of ALK in NSCLC.
In the randomized phase 3 CROWN trial, first-line lorlatinib significantly prolonged progression-free survival versus crizotinib and produced higher intracranial response activity in previously untreated advanced ALK-positive NSCLC. The study enrolled 296 patients and established a CNS-active, third-generation oral…
www.nejm.orgverifiedNov 18, 2020
tractability
Alectinib demonstrates that selective, CNS-penetrant ALK inhibition is an effective modality in treatment-naive advanced NSCLC.
In the randomized phase 3 ALEX trial, alectinib improved progression-free survival versus crizotinib and markedly reduced CNS progression: 12-month progression-free survival was 68.4% versus 48.7%, and CNS progression occurred in 12% versus 45% of patients, respectively.
www.nejm.orgverifiedAug 31, 2017
tractability
ALK-directed oral therapy is tractable beyond metastatic disease, including adjuvant treatment after complete resection.
The FDA approved adjuvant alectinib for ALK-positive NSCLC after tumor resection based on the global randomized ALINA trial in resectable stage IB to IIIA disease. ALK rearrangements were identified using FDA-approved testing or the VENTANA ALK D5F3 CDx assay, demonstrating clinical and diagnostic tractability in…
www.fda.govverifiedApr 18, 2024
tractability
ALK-targeted therapy has an established companion-diagnostic infrastructure, supporting practical biomarker selection and deployment of the modality.
The FDA-authorized companion-diagnostic list includes ALK rearrangement testing for multiple approved ALK-directed therapies, including alectinib, crizotinib, and ceritinib, using assays such as FoundationOne CDx; FDA-authorized ALK FISH and IHC assays are also listed for selecting patients for ALK-directed treatment.
www.fda.govverifiedNov 30, 2017
tractability
The ALK small-molecule modality is vulnerable to acquired on-target resistance, particularly after sequential inhibitor treatment.
A peer-reviewed study combining mutagenesis experiments with repeat biopsies from lorlatinib-resistant patients found compound ALK resistance mutations in 7 of 20 clinical samples (35%). The findings show that sequential first-, second-, and third-generation ALK inhibitors can select compound mutations that confer…
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.govverifiedMay 31, 2018